Industries served

Procurement for Healthcare

Purchased services, agency labor and the vendors behind the revenue cycle often get less scrutiny than clinical supplies. We focus on that non-clinical spend, where terms are complex and visibility is usually thin.

The spend reality

When healthcare procurement comes up, the conversation usually turns to clinical supply chain: medical-surgical products, implants, pharmaceuticals and the group purchasing organization contracts behind them. That work is a specialized discipline with its own clinical governance, and it is not what S2V does.

A large and less scrutinized share of a hospital or health system’s cost base sits elsewhere. Purchased services keep the building running: environmental services, food and nutrition, security, linen, waste, courier and biomedical equipment maintenance. Contingent labor fills clinical and non-clinical shifts through staffing agencies, travel nurse firms and locum providers. The revenue cycle depends on vendors for coding, eligibility, claims, denials and collections. IT spend extends well beyond the core EHR into interfaces, add-on modules, hosting and a long tail of departmental software. Much of this is bought department by department, often outside the materials management systems built for supplies, and governed by contracts that are harder to compare than a product price.

What’s actually broken

Purchased services managed by department, not as a portfolio. Each department head owns their vendors. Contracts renew on different cycles, scopes are defined loosely and performance terms go unmeasured. Across a multi-hospital system, the same service is often bought on different terms at each facility.

Contingent labor that bypasses its own structure. Many systems put a managed service provider or vendor management system in place to control agency staffing. Under operational pressure, units book directly with agencies, accept premium rates and agree to terms outside the program. Orientation hours, overtime rules, cancellation terms and conversion fees vary by agency and are rarely reconciled.

Revenue cycle vendors paid on terms nobody revisits. Coding, eligibility, denials management and collections vendors are often paid on contingency or per-transaction pricing. Placement rules, fee bases and performance guarantees determine what the organization actually pays, and they drift from how accounts are really worked.

IT and EHR-adjacent spend that grows around the core platform. The EHR decision gets executive attention. The interfaces, third-party applications, hosting, support tiers and departmental tools around it often don’t, and they renew with escalators and bundled modules that nobody reconciles against use.

Top addressable categories

  • Environmental services, linen and waste — EVS staffing models and scope, linen agreements, and regulated medical, pharmaceutical and general waste streams.
  • Food and nutrition services — management agreements, patient and retail food, and the performance terms inside outsourced models.
  • Security services — staffing models, technology and the balance between officer hours and systems.
  • Biomedical equipment maintenance — OEM service agreements, independent service organizations, multi-vendor programs and coverage aligned to equipment actually in use.
  • Agency staffing and contingent labor — travel nurses, per diem and locum providers, non-clinical temporary staff, MSP and VMS terms, bill rates and conversion fees.
  • Revenue cycle vendors — coding, eligibility, claims, denials management and collections, including contingency-fee structures.
  • IT and EHR-adjacent software — interfaces, add-on modules, hosting, support, departmental applications and infrastructure.
  • Facilities and plant operations — maintenance and trades, HVAC and critical systems, and capital project sourcing.

Where value leaks

In non-clinical healthcare spend, value rarely leaks at signing. It leaks in how contracts are applied day to day, in terms written for one operating model and billed against another.

Illustration: a health system engages an outside vendor to work aged receivables on a contingency fee. The agreement lets the organization place accounts with the vendor, but nobody defines which accounts qualify or when placement happens. Over time, accounts that the internal team would have resolved in the normal course, such as balances already in payer processing, are placed with the vendor and the fee applies when they pay. Every invoice matches the contract. The leak is in the placement rules, and it only becomes visible when collections are traced back to account history.

The same pattern shows up in agency shifts booked outside the MSP, biomedical service contracts covering equipment that has been retired and EVS scopes billed on outdated square footage. The fix is rarely a lower rate alone. It’s clear operating rules inside the contract and the data to see how it’s actually used.

The S2V approach for healthcare

Potential. We map non-clinical spend across facilities, departments and cost centers, then match it to contracts, scopes and operating data such as shifts worked, equipment inventories and account placements. That shows where terms diverge from reality and where the same service is bought differently across the system.

Priority. We rank opportunities by value, feasibility and operational risk, timed to renewal dates and budget cycles. Anything that touches patient-facing operations is sequenced with clinical and operational leaders, and compliance requirements are flagged up front.

Performance. We restructure and negotiate: purchased-services agreements with defined scopes and performance terms, contingent labor programs that units actually use, revenue cycle fee structures with clear placement rules, biomedical coverage aligned to the equipment inventory and IT renewals right-sized to use. Where vendors will handle protected health information, we make sure business associate agreements and security reviews are part of the sourcing process, with determinations left to your compliance and legal teams.

Value. We track realized results against invoices, shifts and collections, not projected savings, and report them in terms finance and operations leaders recognize, while surfacing the next wave of opportunity before the next renewal cycle.

Data readiness in healthcare

Healthcare systems are built around clinical supplies, which is exactly why non-clinical spend is hard to see. Materials management and ERP systems rely on an item master that purchased services rarely fit, so services are often paid through non-PO invoices or check requests. Labor data sits in the VMS, timekeeping and payroll systems; revenue cycle vendor performance in patient accounting; equipment in the clinical engineering inventory; and contracts in a contract management system, if they’re centralized at all. Across a multi-hospital system, each facility may have its own vendor master and cost-center structure, especially after mergers, and contract IDs rarely appear on invoices.

Before any analysis or AI tooling, we establish whether that data can be joined reliably: a normalized vendor list across entities, consistent cost-center and facility mapping, and a category taxonomy for services, not just supplies. If it can’t, we tell you, and we scope the foundation work separately rather than burying it inside a fixed-fee project.

Outcomes we target

In healthcare, non-clinical procurement succeeds when costs come down without disrupting patient-facing operations or compliance.

  • Realized savings, validated in invoices — results confirmed against invoices, shifts worked and collections, not projected savings.
  • Purchased-services spend under contract — defined scopes, performance terms and consistent pricing across facilities and departments.
  • Contingent labor program adoption — agency bookings running through the MSP or VMS, with bill rates, markups and fees reconciled.
  • Revenue cycle fee discipline — clear placement rules and fee structures that match how accounts are actually worked.
  • Supplier performance and scorecards — service levels in EVS, food, security and biomedical contracts measured and enforced.
  • Compliance built into sourcing — business associate agreements and security reviews surfaced early, with a data foundation that keeps non-clinical spend visible.

Every result is tracked to realized value — measured in invoices and operating performance, not negotiated estimates.

Frequently asked questions

Do you work on clinical supply chain or medical-surgical supplies?

No. Clinical supply chain, GPO-contracted medical supplies and physician preference items are a distinct discipline with their own clinical governance. S2V focuses on non-clinical and indirect spend such as purchased services, contingent labor, revenue cycle vendors, IT and facilities, and works alongside the supply chain team rather than replacing it.

What do you mean by purchased services?

Services a hospital buys rather than performs itself, such as environmental services, food and nutrition, security, linen, waste, biomedical equipment maintenance, courier services and many outsourced administrative functions. They are often managed by department, contracted on varied terms and harder to benchmark than supplies.

How do you handle vendors that access patient information?

We make sure vendor sourcing and contracting surfaces compliance requirements early, including whether a business associate agreement is needed and how the vendor handles data access and security. We don't provide legal or compliance advice; those determinations stay with your privacy, compliance and legal teams.

Can you help with agency staffing and travel nurse spend?

Yes, on the commercial side. We look at bill rates, markups, MSP and vendor-management structures, off-contract bookings, cancellation and orientation terms, and conversion fees, and we work with nursing and HR leaders so changes support staffing needs rather than fight them.

Where does an engagement usually start?

With an assessment of non-clinical spend, contracts and data readiness, the S2V Compass. It produces an evidence-backed opportunity portfolio tied to contract renewal dates and budget cycles, with compliance requirements flagged for each category.

See where value is trapped in your operation.

A Compass assessment maps your spend, contracts and data readiness, and returns an evidence-backed opportunity portfolio.

Request a maturity assessment Start a conversation